KatHighsmith’s Substack

KatHighsmith’s Substack

Share this post

KatHighsmith’s Substack
KatHighsmith’s Substack
Let's Talk About the Skrmetti Decision...

Let's Talk About the Skrmetti Decision...

And Why the Legal System in the United States Can Be Fake

Kat Highsmith's avatar
Kat Highsmith
Jun 22, 2025
∙ Paid
10

Share this post

KatHighsmith’s Substack
KatHighsmith’s Substack
Let's Talk About the Skrmetti Decision...
2
Share

Readers, you have all likely heard about or hopefully fully read United States v. Skrmetti, the momentous decision by the United States Supreme Court.

Many other outlets have covered the legal history (which can be exceedingly tedious) and personalities involved, including The New York Times in an extensive article with quite a bit of information on everyone’s favorite lady lawyer Kate Bachrach (Chase Strangio), the first “openly transgender” person to argue in front of the Supreme Court.

This post is not meant to nitpick the so-called sophisticated legal matters because it is actually quite simple to point out that this case along with Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) reveal that the “transgender” agenda and legal designation are frauds, and the US legal system operates on power while pretending to function on precise logical categories and legal theories.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to KatHighsmith’s Substack to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 KatHighsmith
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share