LILLY TINO UPDATE: He's a Criminal and This Was Inevitable
This Behavior Cannot Be Avoided Because It Is the Goal
Well, I’m shocked.
You could have knocked me over with a feather when I found out that everyone’s favorite cross-dressing “gentleman,” Nick “Lilly” Contino, has been breaking the law, harassing women, and making a spectacle of himself with his idiotic antics both in and out of bathrooms.
He was discussed here on this Substack in this post several months ago after he lamented being clocked by a three-year-old girl in a women’s bathroom at a Cheesecake Factory. Strangely enough, because someone may have suspected him of predatory behavior, he was the victim in that situation, not the females who had tolerate his creepy, unwanted presence in a place where males like him do not belong.
His amazingly underwhelming plastic surgery results were ridiculed here, and his need to focus on children (what a mystery—why always children?) was analyzed here just last month.
This is the man who dressed up like Ms. Rachel, a popular YouTuber and children’s entertainer, to talk about “trans” kids. Again, it is a mystery as to why these men are so insistent on talking about and to little kids. We need some nuance for this complicated issue, guys!
Only one of these is a woman who should be in a women's bathroom. Guess which?
Nick has also admitted that he posted on Reddit under the name “fuckpomegranates” that he sexually assaulted a three-year-old girl when he was a three-year-old child himself. I wonder if this is related to his behavior around children like the three-year-old girl in the women’s bathroom that he posted about? Let us ponder.
Now, Nick has crossed whatever lines there are left and drawn even more national attention with his criminal behavior, and this is the man who talked about having his testicles removed in a video with his mother in front of children at Disneyland.
This was the inexorable conclusion of the “trans” lie because of the reality of male nature. This is a feature, not a bug, and that is why none of this can be “affirmed,” no matter how many times we repeat the platitude of “adults can do whatever they want!” because that will never work and men like Nick demonstrate why.
As is Nick’s habit, he posts videos of getting called “sir” in restaurants and invading women’s spaces on his TikTok. His latest video features selfies and ratings of the women’s bathrooms at Disney World.
As Reduxx reports, one of the women in Nick’s video is considering her legal options because he has violated Florida Statute 810.145, which defines both public and private bathrooms as places with a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Subsequently, recording someone undressing or using the facilities without consent is “explicitly forbidden,” and penalties can include up to five years in prison.
If Nick is eventually charged and convicted he should be sent to a male prison, and that is highly likely to occur in Florida.
This is common behavior by cross-dressing men like Nick because they are violating women’s boundaries in order to validate their perversions and delusions. That is the point of their behavior, and it always has been because “transition” is a lie. They are not seeking to be safe, they don’t feel “dysphoric” since “gender dysphoria” does not exist, and they aren’t sad or trepidatious.
Nobody really cares if they wear makeup or have grown-out hair, so forcing themselves as men where they don’t belong is the goal of what they do because it is the primary way to coerce everyone to go along with their irrational demands.
That is why social media is rife with selfies and videos of men in women’s bathrooms to declare that they have marked their territory.
Tellingly, Nick thinks everyone is upset with him because he is a “trans” woman who does not pass since that is the only issue here, and that it is not fair to judge men like him because he’s still a sub-type of woman even if he knows he will never pass anyway. Those thousands of dollars spent on plastic surgery were a waste then, weren’t they? Not that the doctor (who made a pretty penny) minds.
Obviously, this man is completely insane, but he somewhat haphazardly stumbles upon a salient point here.
If he actually passed, would people have a problem with him? That seems to be what some “reasonable trans” proponents argue because they operate upon the premise that there is a small percentage of “true trans” people who are actually delusional, should get hormones and surgeries, and therefore might pass.
In that case, how would passing be judged? Should there be a national passing certification board to give federal licenses or should it be state-by-state like driver’s licenses, where “gender markers” can already be changed by law? How many of these men actually pass and by whose standards?
So few pass that it is not worth basing an entire medical and legal agenda upon the notion, and even men like Nick know that.
It is not his appearance alone that makes his presence unacceptable in women’s bathrooms. It is the fact that he is a man and therefore cannot be a woman. His comfort is not important here. Reality and women’s safety are far more important, and even if he did pass, he still does not belong there.
That is why when writers like Kirsten Fleming at the New York Post express dismay at Nick’s predatory behavior because it makes the “reasonable trans” people look bad and sad, it is a complete misunderstanding of what is going here:
It’s awfully bizarre to fetishize a toilet and access to a place where women simply want privacy. We want to get in and out. We do not want some creep in Minnie ears taking photos and posting them for the masses like it’s an act of public service.
It’s quite the opposite: a disservice to other trans people.
This is not a disservice to other “trans” people because there are no “trans” people.
And it is not “bizarre” to fetishize access to women’s toilets. That is the entire point of what these men do. It is a fetish for them, including the ones who call themselves “reasonable trans,” because the thrill lies in successfully tricking others.
Most people cannot or do not want to see that since the “true trans” lie is more comforting and palatable to repeat.
Does Kirsten Fleming mean that Nick makes passing cross-dressing men sad? How many of those are there? As already discussed, the number is so low that it’s not important, and everyone knows that. He is a threat to women and children, and that is the only thing that should be considered here.
Once the door is opened to the idea that one can be born in the wrong body and can therefore “feel like” the opposite sex, the behavior of men like Nick in women’s bathrooms, not to mention prisons or sports, is simply inevitable. It cannot be avoided.
The only standard for a so-called “trans” person is self-reporting. Therefore, anyone who says he is “trans” just as Nick did must be affirmed by doctors, the law, and all of society because there is no test to determine “true trans.”
There is no test because “true trans” does not actually exist.
As such, no one who claims to be “trans” can be valid and pretending otherwise damages society, which we can see all around us. That is the only conclusion which can work in a sane world. Nick is just as valid as any other “trans” person in that none are valid.
That truth is what the vast majority of people today are not prepared to say because it directly contradicts the asinine declaration that “adults can do whatever they want!” which is frequently bandied about when discussing this issue.
Since the damage to women’s spaces, prisons, sports, privacy, locker rooms, speech, employment, and gyms is more important than the delusional feelings of men, they have to be told no from the very beginning.
There is no other solution to this problem.
Everyone will see this eventually because this lie is unsustainable, similar to the medical scandal of lobotomies, which occurred not that long ago.
Some people claimed to be extremely satisfied after their lobotomies because they were cured of whatever mental illness they suffered at the time. Doctors like Walter Freeman would cite success stories of happy patients as a legitimate reason for the practice.
That didn’t matter. Overall, it was too harmful to society as a whole and resulted in too much damage, even if a small number of people were happy, to be continued.
Therefore, doctors stopped performing lobotomies and we look back in horror at the stupidity and barbarism of such a practice. What were they thinking? we wonder.
Is what we are doing now with underage children who get mutilative surgeries and hormones, or male athletes in women’s sports, or men like Nick acting a fool in women’s bathrooms actually any better?
What are we thinking?
Future generations will not look back upon this very kindly. It’s better to reverse direction now rather than wait for more male rapists to be put into women’s prisons.
In conclusion, please gaze upon Nick’s feminine gait as he saunters daintily through the magical world of Disney with Minnie Mouse ears perched upon his male cranium, ready for whatever adventures await him, like children accurately noticing that he is a man as “misgendering” does not exist.
Amen to that!
I hope that we all look back in horror at this. I also hope that the compensation payments to anyone harmed as a result are huge. This deserves to be badged as the worst medical and societal scandal in history. It will sit on the shelf with the others while people quickly delete their posts and pretend they weren't complicit.
*(steps down off soap box)*